Settlements in Landmark Auto Parts Litigation Surpass $1 Billion

Class Members’ Recovery to Date in Massive Global Price-Fixing Conspiracies Yields One of the Largest Indirect Purchaser Recoveries in U.S. History.

February 28, 2018

New York, NY—February 28, 2018—Attorneys representing U.S. consumers and businesses in history-making litigation arising out of price-fixing and bid-rigging conspiracies among automotive parts manufacturers announced today that settlements have surpassed $1 billion. The cumulative settlement figure in the case now stands as one of the largest amounts that indirect purchaser “end payors”—the ultimate purchasers of a price-fixed product—have ever recovered in a U.S. antitrust lawsuit.

The massive litigation, coordinated as In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation in federal court in Michigan, has been pending since 2011. Hollis Salzman of Robins Kaplan LLP®, Marc M. Seltzer of Susman Godfrey L.L.P., and Adam J. Zapala of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP serve as co-lead counsel for the end-payor plaintiffs.

These civil antitrust actions grew out of a global criminal antitrust investigation, which exposed long-running agreements among automotive parts manufacturers to rig bids and fix the prices of their products. In the litigation, which encompasses 41 coordinated class actions against more than 160 defendants, end-payor consumers and businesses allege they purchased or leased new automobiles at prices that were artificially inflated as a result of the defendants’ anticompetitive conduct. The most recent settlements, announced on February 22, 2018, call for Sanden to pay $7.6 million and Tenneco to pay $17.48 million, respectively, to the end-payor class, pushing the class’ total recovery to more than $1 billion. The litigation continues against the remaining non-settling defendants. 

“Reaching this milestone is a testament to the many hours of hard work plaintiffs’ counsel have dedicated to litigating what may be the most complicated group of antitrust class actions in U.S. history,” said Salzman,  partner and co-chair of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation practice at Robins Kaplan LLP. “We will continue to vigorously pursue our case against the remaining defendants to maximize the recovery for consumers and businesses who suffered significant economic harm as a result of defendants’ alleged unlawful conduct,” she added.

Seltzer, a partner at Susman Godfrey L.L.P., added, “The settlements achieved to date represent a tremendous victory for the victims of the alleged conspiracies, which were obtained after years of hard fought litigation. Our job, however, is not done, and we intend to continue to fight on behalf of our class members who were injured as a result of defendants’ alleged decades-long price-fixing conspiracies.”

Zapala, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP, added, “Each and every settlement we secure, including the latest ones with Sanden and Tenneco, brings us closer to securing truly historic relief for injured consumers and businesses.”

Back to Top