- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
March 4, 2021Robins Kaplan Files Class Action Against Martin Shkreli and His Former Companies on Behalf of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota
-
March 1, 2021Amy Churan Named an Insurance Trailblazer by National Law Journal
-
March 1, 2021Firm, Partner Recognized by Managing IP
-
March, 9, 2021The New Frontier of Software License Disputes
-
March 9, 2021Health Care Antitrust under President Biden
-
March 11, June 10, and October 7, 2021New York Women in Antitrust Group Spotlight Series
-
Winter 2021Pro Bono Publico–For The Public Good
-
Winter 2021The Case for Charitable Giving
-
Winter 2021The Fictional Wealth Disputes That We Took In and Learned From in 2020
-
March 5, 2021Financial Daily Dose 3.5.2021 | Top Story: Powell Tries to Sooth Jumpy Markets Fearing Weak Jobs Report
-
March 4, 2021Financial Daily Dose 3.4.2021 | Top Story: Google Shakes Up Digital Ad Industry by Phasing Out Web Tracking
-
March 3, 2021Financial Daily Dose 3.3.2021 | Top Story: Rare Merck-J&J Partnership to Boost U.S. Vaccine Production
Robins Kaplan Partner Hollis Salzman Recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a Top 250 Women in Litigation for Second Consecutive Year
August 3, 2017
New York, NY—August 3, 2017—Robins Kaplan LLP® is pleased to announce that Hollis Salzman, co-chair of the firm’s Antitrust and Trade Regulation Practice, has again been named one of the Top 250 Women in Litigation by Benchmark Litigation. This is the second consecutive year Salzman has been named to the list, which is considered the definitive guide to the country’s leading female litigators, and features honorees from across the United States.
Two decades into her career, Salzman has served as court appointed co-lead counsel on a number of the world’s largest antitrust litigation matters, recovering more than $2 billion for victims of anticompetitive conduct. Notably, as co-lead counsel in the massive In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Litigation, a class action against many of the world’s largest airlines, she secured more than $1.2 billion in settlements for purchasers of airfreight services.
Salzman’s groundbreaking work also includes her role as co-lead counsel in In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation—stemming from what the government calls the largest price-fixing conspiracy in U.S. history—in which she has recovered more than $715 million for purchasers of car parts affected by price-fixing agreements to date. She also acts as co-lead counsel in antitrust litigation against the four dominant manufacturers and the largest distributor of contact lenses, and in litigation against the two dominant suppliers of IV saline solution.
Her advocacy in such matters has been recognized by Chambers USA, Benchmark Litigation, and Legal 500, among others. She has also been named to The National Law Journal’s first-ever Antitrust and M&A Trailblazers list, to Global Investigations Review’s list of the 100 most influential Women in Investigations, and was most recently named a Distinguished Leader by the New York Law Journal.
Benchmark Litigation’s extensive research process includes investigation into the individual litigators’ professional activities, as well as client feedback surveys and individual interviews. The complete 2017 guide can be found here.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.