- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 10, 2023Robins Kaplan Announces $28 Million Settlement in Case Against For-Profit College’s Directors & Officers
March 9, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Launches New Professional Development Program
March 19-22, 2023PLRB 2023 Claims Conference
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
February 22, 2023A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
February 7, 2023When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan LLP Secures Decisive Pro Bono Victory in Minnesota Supreme Court
May 25, 2017
Minneapolis, MN—May 25, 2017—The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled today that the Minnesota anti-SLAPP statute was unconstitutional as an impairment of a party’s right to a jury trial under Article I, Section 4 of the Minnesota Constitution, deciding in favor of plaintiffs Lawrence and Sinuon Leiendecker, who were represented pro bono by national trial firm Robins Kaplan LLP®. The decision will allow the Leiendecker’s malicious prosecution lawsuit to continue against the defendants—Asian Women United of Minnesota (AWUM) and others—notwithstanding the provisions of the statute that would have otherwise required dismissal.
Today’s decision was part of a long-running dispute between the parties, dating back more than a decade, arising out of claims raised by Sinuon Leiendecker of mismanagement of the non-profit organization AWUM, and her subsequent termination allegedly in response to her actions. AWUM unsuccessfully sued Sinuon and her husband, Lawrence Leiendecker, who provided pro bono legal services to AWUM. Those suits were terminated with fees awarded to both Sinuon and Lawrence.
The Leiendeckers ultimately sued AWUM and others, alleging that the earlier suits were brought without probable cause and with malice. The defendants sought to have the malicious prosecution suit dismissed under the anti-SLAPP statute, which provides for dismissal of claims based on conduct that “materially relates” to an act of “public participation,” such as bringing a lawsuit, unless the conduct is shown by clear and convincing evidence to constitute a tort. Under the statute, a judge, rather than a jury, is to make the factual determination of the merits of the case, a provision that the court agreed deprived the Leiendeckers of their right to a jury trial.
“We truly felt that this case presented an important issue of constitutional law,” said Eric Magnuson, partner at Robins Kaplan who represented the Leiendeckers and argued the case at the Minnesota Supreme Court. “The right to a jury trial is one of our most respected and revered traditions, and we are pleased to play a part in vindicating that right.”
Robins Kaplan acted as lead counsel to the Leiendeckers at the Minnesota Supreme Court. Robert A. Hill of Robert Hill Law, Thomas B. Gunther of Gunther Law Offices, LLC, and Mahesha Subbaraman of Subbaraman PLLC served as co-counsel.
The case, Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota, was heard before the Minnesota Supreme Court by Associate Justice Anne K. McKeig.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.