- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 10, 2023Robins Kaplan Announces $28 Million Settlement in Case Against For-Profit College’s Directors & Officers
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
February 22, 2023A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
February 7, 2023When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan LLP’s $5.7 Million Trial Victory for Inventor Over La-Z-Boy Validated by Court Ruling
January 5, 2017
Minneapolis, MN—January 5, 2017—After securing a $5.7 million jury award for an inventor’s company in a license dispute over royalties against furniture maker La-Z-Boy Inc. in 2016, national trial firm Robins Kaplan LLP® has received an order by a Florida federal court rejecting all of La-Z-Boy’s remaining defenses.
“We are gratified by the court’s ruling, which required La-Z-Boy to honor the promises it made to our client,” said Ronald J. Schutz, chair of Robins Kaplan’s national Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation group and lead counsel for the plaintiff in the litigation. Robins Kaplan represented Megdal Associates LLC, a company co-founded by the late inventor Paul Megdal, who, in the late 1990s, designed mechanisms to power the furniture giant’s popular recliners.
The case stemmed from a 2002 license agreement in which La-Z-Boy agreed to pay Megdal Associates royalties on sales of products that incorporated its technology for use in La-Z-Boy’s furniture. In November 2014, Robins Kaplan filed suit on behalf of Megdal Associates against La-Z-Boy for breach of the license. After a March 2016 trial, a jury found that La-Z-Boy violated the license agreement by failing to pay royalties on three different successful product lines and awarded Megdal Associates $5.7 million in damages.
Yesterday’s ruling rejected five different equitable defenses asserted by La-Z-Boy, which the court considered independent of the jury. “The Court’s detailed and thorough opinion has now resolved all of La-Z-Boy’s defenses in favor of Megdal Associates,” said Robins Kaplan principal Patrick M. Arenz, who handled oral argument on these defenses and tried the jury case with Schutz. “This decision, along with the jury verdict, vindicates Paul Megdal’s work and contribution to La-Z-Boy’s successful line of power motion furniture.”
In addition to Schutz and Arenz, the Robins Kaplan team included Ari B. Lukoff, Emily E. Niles, and Shira T. Shapiro.
The case, Megdal Associates LLC v. La-Z-Boy Inc., was heard before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida by the Hon. William J. Zloch.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.