- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 4, 2024Trust & Estate Litigation in Minnesota
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan LLP Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Class-Action Antitrust Lawsuit Alleging Collusion Among Suppliers of Saline to U.S. Hospitals
January 5, 2017
New York, NY—January 5, 2017—National trial firm Robins Kaplan LLP® announced today that it has been appointed co-lead counsel in a class action antitrust lawsuit against the three dominant suppliers of IV saline solution, a vital medical supply used in hospitals nationwide.
Robins Kaplan filed the first complaint in the country in November 2016 alleging that defendants Baxter International, Baxter Healthcare, and Hospira—which together control approximately 90 percent of the market—orchestrated an artificial rise in prices under the pretext of a supply shortage.
“The complaint alleges that the defendants created a public health crisis—one that was avoidable and that unnecessarily drove up the cost of healthcare for hospitals and vulnerable patients,” said Hollis Salzman, co-chair of Robins Kaplan’s Antitrust and Trade Regulation group. “We look forward to pursuing this action, obtaining redress for hospitals and others that have paid a higher price resulting from the defendants’ alleged collusion.”
According to the allegations in the complaint, beginning in 2013 the defendants undertook extensive efforts to create a supply shortage that would justify price increases, including allocating the volume of product that each would place on the market. In addition, as the purported shortage extended over time, it became the subject of Congressional scrutiny. Approximately one year ago, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators urged the Federal Trade Commission to investigate possible collusion among saline suppliers, which it noted “are reported to have increased their prices by 200-300 percent.” The letter continued: “This equates to increased annual costs to individual hospitals in the range of hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars.”
As court-appointed co-lead counsel, Robins Kaplan represents a proposed class of direct purchasers, including hospitals, that purchased IV saline solution after January 1, 2013. Providers of IV saline solution generate in excess of $1.2 billion in annual revenue.
The case is Washington County Health Care Authority, Inc. et al. vs. Baxter International Inc., et al. It is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois before the Hon. John J. Tharp, Jr.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.