- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
January 15, 2021Robins Kaplan Partners Named to IAM Strategy 300 Global Leaders Guide
-
January 12, 20212025 Goals - Our commitment to Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity
-
January 5, 2021Litigator Mark Hallberg Joins Robins Kaplan LLP
-
January 28, 2021COVID-19: The Show Did Not Go On
-
February 9, 2021Smart Phone Privacy and Data Security – How to Assess and Minimize Risk in the Current Reality
-
March 6, 2021With Our Voices 2021 Arc Gala
-
2020Clear Evidence Clarified
-
December 27, 2020Covid-19 Relief Bill Provides Long-Awaited Funding to Small Businesses and Individuals
-
December 17. 2020Covid-19 Divorce and Marital Property Agreements
-
January 15, 2021Financial Daily Dose 1.15.2021 | Top Story: As Unemployment Claims Surge, Biden Unveils $1.9T Covid Recovery Proposal
-
January 14, 2021Financial Daily Dose 1.14.2021 | Top Story: Intel Ousts CEO Robert Swan After Just Two Years
-
January 13, 2021Financial Daily Dose 1.13.2021 | Top Story: Visa Jettisons Plaid Takeover After DOJ Antitrust Challenge
Robins Kaplan LLP Secures Repeal of a “One-of-a-Kind” Federal Injunction Against Oglala Sioux Tribe Industrial Hemp Farmer
March 30, 2016
Minneapolis, MN – March 30, 2016 – National law firm Robins Kaplan LLP® announced today that the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota has lifted an 11-year-old injunction that prevented Oglala Sioux Tribe industrial hemp famer Alex White Plume from exploring the legal farming of industrial hemp. The injunction against Mr. White Plume was the only one of its kind in the United States.
Located on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, White Plume’s farm is subject to the Oglala Sioux Tribe Ordinances and the 2014 Farm Bill, both of which allow for the legal farming of non-drug industrial hemp.
“Today’s ruling brings some justice to Native America’s first modern day hemp farmer,” said Tim Purdon, partner at Robins Kaplan and co-chair of the firm’s American Indian Law and Policy Group and Government and Internal Investigations Group, who secured today’s motion and is based in Bismarck, North Dakota. “The 2014 Farm Bill changed the hemp farming laws for all Americans, but it took this order to put hemp pioneer Alex White Plume on equal footing. This is a victory for Alex, but also for tribal sovereignty,” he added.
Non-drug industrial hemp was legalized by the Oglala Sioux Tribe in 1998. In 2014, Congress passed the Farm Bill recognizing a distinction between marijuana and industrial hemp that created an exception to the Controlled Substance Act to allow for growth, cultivation, and the study of industrial hemp in certain limited circumstances. The 2004 permanent injunction by the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota had prevented White Plume from growing non-drug industrial hemp on his family’s land.
“We continue to urge the Department of Justice to allow America’s sovereign Tribes to explore Industrial Hemp farming under the 2014 Farm Bill in the same way the states have been allowed to,” added Purdon, who served as United States Attorney for the District of North Dakota from August 2010 to March 2015.
Robins Kaplan attorney Michael Reif also represented White Plume in this matter.
Related Professionals
Timothy Q. Purdon
Partner
Co-Chair, American Indian Law and Policy Group;
Co-Chair, Government and Internal Investigations Group;
Co-Chair, Diversity Committee
Michael D. Reif
Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.