- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 10, 2023Robins Kaplan Announces $28 Million Settlement in Case Against For-Profit College’s Directors & Officers
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
February 22, 2023A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
February 7, 2023When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Robins Kaplan Secures Two Eighth Circuit Wins for Firm's Clients
September 4, 2015
Robin Kaplan’s Appellate Advocacy and Guidance Group recently secured two wins for its clients in class action lawsuits before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Insulate SB, Inc. v. Advanced Finishing Systems, Inc.
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14233 (8th Cir. Minn. Aug. 13, 2015)
In the first case, the Eighth Circuit unanimously affirmed dismissal of a putative antitrust class action lawsuit brought against our client Graco, Inc. The lawsuit was brought by Insulate SB, Inc., a purchaser of spray foam equipment (FSE). Insulate had alleged that Graco and a number of FSE distributors conspired to restrain trade in violation of federal and state antitrust and consumer protection laws. Robins Kaplan successfully argued at the district and appeals court that Insulate failed to plausibly allege that Graco entered into any exclusive-dealing agreement or conspiracy with any FSE distributor. The decision reaffirms and clarifies the Colgate doctrine, which allows a manufacturer to unilaterally implement resale and other policies toward its distributors and enforce those policies with the threat of termination, and allows distributors to acquiesce in those policies to avoid termination, all without creating an “agreement” subject to the antitrust laws
Gray v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14693 (8th Cir. Mo. Aug. 21, 2015)
In the second case, Robins Kaplan’s appeal team, working in collaboration with co-counsel, O’Melveny & Myers, won reversal of a grant of summary judgment to the class plaintiffs for our client, FedEx Ground Packaging System, Inc. At issue in this employment classification class action was the question of whether FedEx Ground’s truck operators should be classified as independent contractors or employees under Missouri law when some of the operators drive and others hire drivers to work their routes.
The Graco appeal team was led by Partner Stephen P. Safranski, and included Partners Anne M. Lockner and Kellie Lerner. Partner and former Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court Eric J. Magnuson led the firm’s efforts for FedEx Ground.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.