- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 28, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2023 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow and Pathfinder
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
March 2023Unintended Consequences of Banning Noncompete Agreements
March 26, 2023What I’ll Be Watching for in the Amgen Oral Arguments
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
PCT International, Inc. Obtains Permanent Injunction Against Amphenol Subsidiary Holland Electronics
September 16, 2015
MINNEAPOLIS, September 16, 2015—After a federal jury ruled last May in favor of PCT International, Inc. on the company’s claims that Holland Electronics, LLC infringed its patent covering coaxial cable connectors, Judge James A. Teilborg upheld the jury’s verdict on post-trial motions and granted a rare permanent injunction last week. As a result, defendant Holland Electronics, a subsidiary of Amphenol Corporation, is prohibited from further infringement for the life of the asserted patent, and must immediately cease all sales of each of the 60 separate products found to infringe PCT’s patent rights. The infringing products include Holland’s SLCU 6 series coaxial cable connector and numerous connectors sold by Holland under the trade name Superlok.
“We are tremendously pleased with Judge Teilborg’s order, which validates our right to protect the unique intellectual property we’ve worked so hard to develop,” said Steve Youtsey, CEO of PCT, the Arizona-based manufacturer of products for broadband communication networks. “The permanent injunction will allow us to further our dedication to product quality, and focus our efforts on additional innovations.”
Judge Teilborg’s order stems from nearly three years of litigation led by Robins Kaplan LLP in which PCT asserted that Holland Electronics had infringed its unique, patented design for coaxial cable connectors. The order ensures that PCT is the only company selling coaxial cable connectors utilizing the patented technology. The order also denied in its entirety Holland’s motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, which sought to overturn the jury’s verdict on validity, including anticipation, obviousness, indefiniteness, infringement, and damages, and rejected Holland’s defenses of laches and estoppel.
Robins Kaplan partner Christopher Larus led the team representing PCT in the four-week trial and during post-trial briefing. “This order emphasizes our strong commitment to safeguarding PCT’s valuable intellectual property,” noted Larus, who chairs the Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation Group in Robins Kaplan’s Minneapolis office. “We are grateful for the opportunity to represent such an inventive and emerging company.”
Robins Kaplan attorneys John Harting, Jamie Kurtz, Bryan Mechell, Ryan Dornberger, and Mathew Yang also represented PCT at trial and/or during post-trial briefing.
The case, titled PCT International Incorporated v. Holland Electronics LLC, was heard by Judge James Teilborg in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The patent in dispute is United States Patent No. 6,042,422, titled “coaxial cable end connector crimped by axial compression.” Keith Beauchamp of Coppersmith Brockelman PLC served as co-counsel to PCT in the litigation.
About PCT International, Inc.
Founded in 1997 by Steve Youtsey, PCT International, Inc. is a leading worldwide developer and manufacturer of last mile and access network solutions for broadband communication networks. PCT focuses on innovative and cost-effective solutions that allow service providers to improve system integrity and expand service offerings. PCT’s portfolio includes transmission, connectivity, metro Ethernet and Fiber to the Home products for cable, telco and satellite service providers. PCT’s collaborative approach to product development results in advances that simplify installation and maintenance; improve the integrity of HFC and fiber infrastructures; reduce truck rolls and other associated costs; and most importantly increase customer satisfaction and reduce churn. By working closely with customers’ field engineering personnel, we produce equipment and components that straightforwardly address real needs and enable operators to “Harden the Drop.” To learn more visit, pctcorporate.com.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.