- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
July 6, 2022Managing IP Recognizes Robins Kaplan For Patent Contentious and PTAB Litigation in 2022
-
July 5, 2022Robins Kaplan Announces New Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee Co-Chairs
-
July 5, 2022Robins Kaplan Ranked Among Best Law Firms for Training and Professional Development
-
July 14, 2022Summer Associate Webinar
-
July 18, 202240th Annual Public Justice Gala & Awards Presentation
-
July 21, 2022MAIBA Scholarship Golf Tournament
-
June 21, 2022Briefly: How To Oppose An Extension If You Really Need To
-
June 7, 2022Damned if You Do,
Damned if You Don’t -
June 7, 2022Take-Home COVID: The New Frontier?
-
July 1, 2022Markets Close Out Worst First-Half Performance in 50 Years
-
June 30, 2022Spirit Again Delays Shareholder Vote on Frontier Deal After JetBlue Sweetens Bid
-
June 29, 2022Despite Headwinds, Disney Reappoints Chapek as CEO Through 2025
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
National Law Journal Names Robins Kaplan to Plaintiffs' Hot List
March 3, 2015
MINNEAPOLIS (March 2015) – Robins Kaplan LLP is pleased to announce its inclusion on The National Law Journal’s 2015 Plaintiffs’ Hot List. The list, which was released on March 2, recognizes firms in the United States for their “exemplary, cutting-edge work” on behalf of plaintiffs.
The National Law Journal highlighted Robins Kaplan’s “track record for litigating and negotiating complex cases resulting in verdicts and settlements worth hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars for their plaintiff clients.” It also noted some of the firm’s most recent and prominent victories in antitrust and mass tort cases, including a $590.5 million cash settlement in Dahl v. Bain Capital Partners and a $1.4 billion global settlement in the consolidated Stryker Corp. litigation that involved defective hip implants.
Robins Kaplan Partners Tara Sutton and K. Craig Wildfang were featured in The National Law Journal’s profile of the firm.
Ms. Sutton, who negotiated the Stryker Corp. litigation settlement and serves as Chair of the firm’s Mass Tort Group, said that “the odds are stacked against ordinary people in mass tort litigation,” but Robins Kaplan positions itself for a leadership role when its attorneys take on a mass tort case.
The firm was also recognized for its notable results in cases of international scope involving air freight services and auto parts. Hollis Salzman, Co-Chair of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group, is litigating two of the largest global price-fixing conspiracies in U.S. history.
In In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, Ms. Salzman has secured nearly $1 billion to date for businesses that purchased airfreight services directly from a group of defendants that originally included 50 airlines operating across six continents. In multidistrict litigation stemming from the largest criminal antitrust investigation conducted by the Department of Justice in U.S. history, Ms. Salzman’s team has defeated motions to dismiss in the first six of 29 separate but coordinated civil cases in In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, bringing total recoveries for the plaintiffs to over $100 million.
Firms nominated for the 2015 Plaintiffs’ Hot List were only considered if they had at least one significant plaintiffs win between Feb. 1, 2014, and Jan. 31, 2015. Hot List firms must also devote at least 50 percent of their litigation resources to plaintiffs work.
Related Professionals
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.