- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 10, 2023Robins Kaplan Announces $28 Million Settlement in Case Against For-Profit College’s Directors & Officers
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
February 22, 2023A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
February 7, 2023When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Confirms Patent Challenge by PCT International
MINNEAPOLIS (September 2014) -- The United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has found all 16 challenged claims of Amphenol’s U.S. Patent No. 7,544,094 (’094 patent) to be unpatentable. Patent challenger PCT International, a leading worldwide developer and manufacturer of last mile and access network solutions for broadband communication networks, maintained the patent was invalid, a position the PTAB has now confirmed. The patent at issue involves a connector assembly with a gripping sleeve for tightening electrical connectors. Sleeves are commonly used to securely connect coaxial cable connectors to electrical equipment such as televisions or cable set top boxes.
In PCT International Inc., v. Amphenol Corporation, IPR2013-00229, Paper 30 (PTAB September 11, 2014), the PTAB found that most of the challenged claims were anticipated, and all of them were obvious.
In a 2013 suit, Amphenol had accused PCT of infringing the ’094 Patent. PCT denied the claim, and in April 2013 filed a challenge to the patent’s validity using the Patent Office’s new inter partes review (IPR) procedure. Amphenol’s lawsuit was then stayed pending a decision by the PTAB.
“We are grateful that the PTAB confirmed the full sweep of all challenged claims as unpatentable. The IPR avoided unnecessary time and expenses that would have prolonged this litigation and was the best option for this patent claim challenge,” said Cyrus Morton, Chair of the firm’s Patent Office Trials Group and counsel for PCT.
Steve Youtsey, Chairman of PCT, said, “PCT prides itself on innovation, and we believed all along that that Amphenol’s claim was without merit. We are pleased to see our position vindicated.”
PCT was represented in the IPR by firm lawyers Cyrus Morton and Miles Finn, Ph.D., and lead counsel in the litigation is Chris Larus, Chair of the Minneapolis IP and Technology Litigation Group.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.