- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 4, 2024Trust & Estate Litigation in Minnesota
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
New Settlements Push Recoveries Past $750 Million in Air Cargo Antitrust Litigation
February 14, 2014
Plaintiffs have secured an additional $65 million partial settlement in the case titled In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1775, raising the total settlements in the case to over three-quarters of a billion dollars, subject to final court approval. The federal antitrust litigation was filed nearly a decade ago over an alleged global conspiracy to inflate prices of airfreight shipping services. The plaintiffs’ case against the remaining defendants continues. To date, more than $485 million in settlements have already received final approval by the Court.
Plaintiffs obtained the most recent settlements after an extensive class certification hearing in the federal Eastern District of New York at the end of 2013. The parties are awaiting the court’s decision on class certification. In separate criminal probes, 23 air cargo carriers have pleaded guilty to participation in the conspiracy and agreed to criminal fines in excess of $1.8 billion.
“We’re pleased to have achieved these additional settlements, which will compensate the victims of this conspiracy and provide a measure of justice for plaintiffs and the proposed class” said co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs, Hollis Salzman, Partner and Co-chair of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group at Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.
“The settlements announced today bring us closer to a final resolution for the thousands of businesses harmed for years by artificially inflated prices for air shipping services,” Salzman added.
The litigation is pending before the Hon. John Gleeson and Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.