- Affirmative Recovery
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
November 30, 2020Ronald Schutz, Christopher Larus, and Cyrus Morton named in IAM Global Leaders Guide
-
November 20, 2020Phil Sieff Selected as a Fellow of the Litigation Counsel of America
-
November 20, 2020Robins Kaplan Named Breastfeeding-Friendly Workplace
-
November 8, 2020The Fix Is In! How to Investigate and Litigate Price Fixing Cases
-
December 1-10, 20207th Annual IP Dealmakers Forum
-
December 11, 2020LGBTQ Legal Services: Transgender Name Change Clinic
-
November 2020Explaining the Almost Unexplainable
-
November 12, 2020If Your Company Received a Paycheck Protection Program Loan - The SBA Wants to Know How Necessary Was Your Loan
-
November 9, 2020Hatch-Waxman Venue Is Further Narrowed
-
December 2, 2020Financial Daily Dose 12.2.2020 | Top Story: Treasury, Fed Paint Divergent Views of Economic Recovery
-
December 1, 2020Financial Daily Dose 12.1.2020 | Top Story: GM Adjusts Deal with Nikola, Won’t Take Stock in E-Truckmaker
-
November 30, 2020Financial Daily Dose 11.30.2020 | Top Story: Salesforce in Talks to Buy Slack Technologies
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Wholesale Grocery Suppliers Beat Antitrust Suit
The consolidated antitrust action was filed on behalf of grocery stores in 13 states alleging that their grocery suppliers, C&S and SuperValu, colluded to consolidate regional market power in violation of the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act.
January 14, 2013
Law360, New York (January 14, 2013, 6:14 PM ET) -- A Minnesota federal judge Friday dismissed the claims of the two remaining plaintiffs in a suit alleging wholesale grocery suppliers SuperValu Inc. and C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc. conspired to inflate prices by entering into a noncompete agreement.
U.S. District Judge Ann D. Montgomery granted the defendants' summary judgment motion in a Jan. 11 opinion, finding that D&G Inc. and DeLuca’s Market Corp. failed to demonstrate how the two largest U.S. wholesale grocery companies harmed competition when they swapped distribution centers located in each other’s territories and agreed not to solicit customers of the transferred facilities for five years afterward.
All Content © 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc.
Law360
Related Professionals
Stephen P. Safranski
Partner
Related Publications
October 22, 2020
No-Poach Antitrust Standard Unclear In Franchising
William Reiss, Matthew Geyer - Law360
Summer 2020
A Perfect Storm: Health Care Consolidation and the Lack of Antitrust Enforcement
Kellie Lerner, Matthew Geyer - Antitrust, Vol. 34, No. 3, American Bar Association
May 26, 2020
Joint ventures and the COVID-19 pandemic
Eamon O'Kelly, Adam Mendel - Thomson Reuters, Westlaw
May 18, 2020
May 11, 2020
Competitor Collaborations and Covid-19—Antitrust Considerations
Stephen Safranski, Eric Barstad - Bloomberg Law
Related News
September 22, 2020
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.