- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP™
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLPTM
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
September 15, 2021Jennifer Leland Named President of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Foundation
-
September 15, 2021Roman Silberfeld Named to Annual List of Top 100 Attorneys in California
-
September 14, 2021Robins Kaplan Increases Starting Associate Salaries to $180,000
-
September 18, 20212021 Walk Like MADD Minnesota
-
September 18, 2021Page Education Foundation 2021 Justice Gala
-
September 21, 2021USC Gould School of Law 2021 Intellectual Property Institute
-
August 26, 2021Briefly: Motions for judicial notice in the 8th Circuit
-
Summer 2021Robins Kaplan Blocks Effort by Juul and Altria to Sidestep Blame for Minnesota’s Youth Vaping Epidemic
-
Summer 2021The Chauvin Case:
A Lifting of the Veil or Only a Peek Behind the Curtain? -
September 16, 2021Financial Daily Dose 9.16.2021 | Top Story: White House Discusses Vax Mandates With Business Leaders
-
September 15, 2021Financial Daily Dose 9.15.2021 | Top Story: CPI Shows Slowing Price Increases in August
-
September 15, 2021Protecting Your Trade Secrets: Trust but Verify
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Wholesale Grocery Suppliers Beat Antitrust Suit
The consolidated antitrust action was filed on behalf of grocery stores in 13 states alleging that their grocery suppliers, C&S and SuperValu, colluded to consolidate regional market power in violation of the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act.
January 14, 2013
Law360, New York (January 14, 2013, 6:14 PM ET) -- A Minnesota federal judge Friday dismissed the claims of the two remaining plaintiffs in a suit alleging wholesale grocery suppliers SuperValu Inc. and C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc. conspired to inflate prices by entering into a noncompete agreement.
U.S. District Judge Ann D. Montgomery granted the defendants' summary judgment motion in a Jan. 11 opinion, finding that D&G Inc. and DeLuca’s Market Corp. failed to demonstrate how the two largest U.S. wholesale grocery companies harmed competition when they swapped distribution centers located in each other’s territories and agreed not to solicit customers of the transferred facilities for five years afterward.
All Content © 2003-2013, Portfolio Media, Inc.
Law360
Related Professionals
Stephen P. Safranski
Partner
Related Publications
July 6, 2021
'Abuse of dominance': Was this what Congress originally intended for Section 2?
Eamon O'Kelly, Vidya Dindiyal - Westlaw Today
Spring 2021
April 13, 2021
US Antitrust Regulators Should Foster Climate Collaboration
Ben Steinberg, Adam Mendel - Law360
October 22, 2020
No-Poach Antitrust Standard Unclear In Franchising
William Reiss, Matthew Geyer - Law360
Summer 2020
A Perfect Storm: Health Care Consolidation and the Lack of Antitrust Enforcement
Kellie Lerner, Matthew Geyer - Antitrust, Vol. 34, No. 3, American Bar Association
Related News
August 23, 2021
July 27, 2021
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.