- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
June 7, 2023Partner Tim Billion Honored With 2023 Appellate Advocacy Award
June 6, 2023Super Lawyers Names Five Attorneys to “Southern California Rising Stars” List
June 1, 2023Chambers USA Recognizes Five Robins Kaplan Practice Groups and 17 Lawyers in 2023 Guide
June 13, 20232023 Probate and Trust Law Section Conference
June 14, 2023Leading Through Uncertainty
June 15, 2023Enhance Your Super Powers by Clerking
May 2023Raoul Shah: Keeping Humanity and Compassion Close
May 18, 2023NFT Trademark Defense Comes Down To Licensing Terms
April 20, 2023Drafting Subsequent Agreements to Avoid Arbitrability Litigation
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Court Affirms Celador $320 Million Verdict Against Disney in "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" Case
On December 3, 2012, a three judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a Memorandum of Disposition affirming the jury verdict in favor of Celador International, Ltd. against Disney for $320 million.
December 4, 2012
LOS ANGELES (December 4, 2012) – On December 3, 2012, a three judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a Memorandum of Disposition affirming the jury verdict in favor of Celador International, Ltd. against Disney for $320 million.
The lawsuit, filed in 2004, arose over a dispute regarding profits from the highly successful game show "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" which became a smash hit in 1999 and took ABC from #4 to #1 in network rankings. The show was created by British company Celador International, Ltd. which licensed the rights to ABC Television and Buena Vista Television for North America. In return, Celador was to share fifty-fifty in expected profits from the show. But based on accountings generated by The Walt Disney Co., not only did the show − which aired on ABC for three years and has been in syndication for ten years − never make a profit, it generated over $70 million in "losses" for Disney. The jury found otherwise after a four week trial in Riverside, Calif.
On July 7, 2010, a federal jury awarded Celador International, Ltd. $269.4 million in damages after unanimously finding that Disney subsidiaries − ABC Television, Buena Vista Television, and Valleycrest Productions, Ltd. − had breached their contract with Celador to share profits from the enormously successful game show "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" In reaching its verdict in Celador International Ltd. v. Walt Disney Co., the nine member jury also unanimously found that the Defendants breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing that they owed to Celador. On September 27, 2010, the Court awarded $50 million in prejudgment interest to Celador, bringing the total to $320 million in damages. On December 21, 2010, the trial court denied Walt Disney Co.'s bid to overturn the jury verdict. The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury’s verdict today in a brief 6-page decision.
Paul Smith, chairman of Celador, said, “Our litigation objectives − to receive what we were fairly entitled to under our contract and to be made substantially whole − were realized by the jury’s verdict and today by the Court of Appeals’ decision. I am pleased that justice has been done.”
Celador’s trial lawyers Roman M. Silberfeld and Bernice Conn, partners with Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. in Los Angeles said, “We’re exceptionally gratified for our client that the Court of Appeals has affirmed the trial verdict and judgment. Both the trial judge’s and an attentive jury’s thoughtful and careful assessment of the law and facts were upheld today.”
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.