- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
May 26, 2022Shira Shapiro Named Woman of Promise By The Pearl Society
-
May 12, 2022Robins Kaplan Practice Group, Attorney Recognized in Elite Trial Lawyers Awards
-
May 9, 2022Six Partners Recognized as “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property
-
June 2, 2022Hennepin County Bar Foundation 2022 Bar Benefit
-
June 2, 2022Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers 2022 Stepping Up Breakfast
-
June 2, 2022YWCA Minneapolis Empower Possible
-
May 24, 2022Briefly: Seeking Fees and Costs While on Appeal
-
May 19, 202211th Circ. Ban On Service Awards May Inhibit Class Actions
-
May 13, 2022Trademark Applications and the Murky Waters of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
-
May 27, 2022Unexpectedly Strong Retail Sales Pull Markets Back from the Brink
-
May 26, 2022Fed Minutes Show Inflation-Fighting Commitment, Spur Market Rally
-
May 25, 2022Mining Giant Glencore Fined $1.1B Over Global Bribery and Price Manipulation Scheme
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Court Rules that the American Association for Justice did not Abandon Trademark Name in Rebranding Effort
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota has found that the American Association for Justice a/k/a Association of Trial Lawyers of America did not abandon its ATLA® and ASSOCIATION OF TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA trademarks after adopting its new corporate name.
March 24, 2010
MINNEAPOLIS - March 24, 2010 - Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. announced today that the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota has found as a matter of law that the American Association for Justice a/k/a Association of Trial Lawyers of America ("AAJ/ATLA"), the world's largest plaintiff bar association, did not abandon its ATLA® and ASSOCIATION OF TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA trademarks after adopting its new corporate name as part of a corporate re-branding program. The ruling now clears the way for AAJ/ALTA to proceed to trial on its trademark infringement action against an entity calling itself The American Trial Lawyers' Association.
The AAJ is represented in this matter by trial litigation firm Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. Christopher K. Larus, partner with Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, said, "This ruling confirms that AAJ/ATLA did not abandon its longstanding trademark rights simply because it adopted a new corporate name. This case demonstrates that a trademark holder does not abandon its existing trademark rights merely because it adopts a new name."
AAJ/ATLA adopted the name American Association for Justice in 2006 to better reflect its mission to promote a fair and effective justice system for all Americans. Despite this name change, AAJ/ATLA continued to use the ATLA® and ASSOCIATION OF TRIAL LAWYERS OF AMERICA marks, including in its communications to members and in connection with its legal education services and publications.
In 2007 J. Keith Givens, a former AAJ/ATLA member, started a competing plaintiffs lawyers association called "The American Trial Lawyers Association" and used the abbreviations "TATLA" and "TheATLA." After initial efforts to persuade Givens to adopt a different name for his new organization proved unsuccessful, the AAJ/ATLA sued for trademark infringement under the Federal Lanham Act and for violation of the Anticybersquatting Protection Act.
In addition to finding that AAJ/ATLA had not abandoned its trademark rights, the Court also denied in its entirety the motion for summary judgment brought by Givens and his new organization. This clears the way for a trial on AAJ/ATLA's claims against Givens and his organization.
No trial date has yet been set.
Related Professionals
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.