- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 10, 2023Robins Kaplan Announces $28 Million Settlement in Case Against For-Profit College’s Directors & Officers
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
February 22, 2023A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
February 7, 2023When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Medical Malpractice Case Report: $4 Million Settlement For Failure to Administer Pre-and Post-Operative Blood Thinners Resulting in Stroke
Firm Partner Chris Messerly achieved a $4 million medical malpractice settlement in a case involving a failure to administer pre-and post-operative blood thinners to a 55-year-old professional woman undergoing aneurysm coiling procedure resulting in stroke. Read the following Minnesota Association for Justice (MAJ) Minnesota Case Report, Volume 29, Number 1, February 2010:
(Excerpts taken with permission from Minnesota Association for Justice (MAJ) “Minnesota Case Reports”)
In 2003, Plaintiff's brother had several aneurysms in his brain. Since cerebral aneurysms are known to be hereditary, Plaintiff underwent testing and discovered that she had five brain aneurysms. In March 2003, Plaintiff underwent an elective "coil embolization" procedure to repair three of the five aneurysms. The surgery was performed by the defendant interventional radiologists.
The uneventful procedure in March 2003 was followed by twelve hours of treatment with two IV blood thinners: Integrilin and Heparin. Plaintiff was also "loaded" with Plavix while in the hospital. (Plavix is a medication that prevents blood cells from sticking together and forming clots.) She was discharged from the hospital the next day with instructions to take Plavix daily for six weeks. Plaintiff did well following surgery and returned to work.
Plaintiff returned to the hospital for a second elective coiling procedure by defendants in May 2003, for the two remaining aneurysms. Before surgery, Plaintiff was asked to sign a consent form, which outlined the types of blood thinning medications, including Aspirin, Plavix, and Heparin, that a patient would need to take before, during and after the procedure. Plaintiff again underwent coiling of the aneurysms, but also had a stent placed in her left internal carotid artery. During the procedure, Plaintiff was again given blood thinning medications, Heparin and Integrilin. However, when she left the operating room, these medications were discontinued.
The procedure was completed at about 2:15 PM, and Plaintiff was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It was not until about 9:00 PM, that Plaintiff was given a 75 mg dose of Plavix. At that time, she was noted by the nurse to be "alert and oriented." At 9:30 PM, a nurse recorded that Plaintiff sat up in the bed and looked at her, but was unable to speak. She stated that Plaintiff could grab the nurse's hand with her right hand and squeeze, but a few seconds later was unable to move her right arm at all. Plaintiff had suffered a massive stroke as a result of a large blood clot in the vessel where the stent had been placed.
Plaintiff has very little use of the right side of her body, which is mostly paralyzed. She has severe spasticity in her right arm and leg and she wears braces on the arm and leg. She also has reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). She has a Baclofen pump that was surgically installed to help with the pain. She can only walk short distances, using a walker or a cane. She has difficulty understanding the world around her, but she does clearly understand how dramatically her life has changed. She has expressive aphasia, which means she cannot communicate her needs or wishes to anyone. She makes her thoughts and needs known by pointing and responding "yes" or "no" as others ask questions to figure out what she's trying to say. Plaintiff is very isolated. She spends most of her day in a recliner chair, watching TV. A home care aide comes twice a day for two hours to help her bathe, get dressed, get the brace on her leg and hand, make her meals, remind her to take her medications, and do a few chores. She has lost her independence and has to rely on others for just about everything. She is depressed.
Plaintiff was a highly-respected corporate professional and she is the mother of two grown sons. Special damages include past and future loss of wages and pension benefits of $960,521; future life care needs ranging from $6,514,742 to $4,611,651 depending upon several variables; past medical $718,865.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.