- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 30, 2023Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Robins Kaplan Partner Tara Sutton Give Opening Statements in Minnesota’s Lawsuit Against JUUL
March 28, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2023 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow and Pathfinder
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
April 19, 2023FBA Women in MDL, Mass and Class Leadership
March 2023Unintended Consequences of Banning Noncompete Agreements
March 26, 2023What I’ll Be Watching for in the Amgen Oral Arguments
March 2023How an Investor Can Lose More Than Just Their Investment
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Eleventh Circuit Throws Out Privacy Suit Seeking Billions
On December 21, 2009, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a summary judgment decision in favor of Imagitas, Inc.
January 25, 2010
On December 21, 2009, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a summary judgment decision in favor of Imagitas, Inc. Imagitas had been hired by Florida's Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to solicit advertising, and then place that advertising inside official mailings that remind motor vehicle owners to renew their vehicle registrations. Plaintiffs alleged that the federal Drivers' Privacy Protection Act precludes sending advertising to addresses collected by state departments of motor vehicles absent express consent from the vehicle owners. Plaintiffs further sought billions of dollars in damages, as the DPPA authorizes courts to award $2500 per individual in damages.
The Florida lawsuit is one of many similar lawsuits filed against Imagitas across the United States. In 2007, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granted Imagitas's motion to have all of the cases coordinated before a single court. That court, in the Middle District of Florida, then agreed to treat the Florida action as a test case. Following expedited discovery, the district court granted Imagitas's motion for summary judgment. The district court agreed with Imagitas that Congress did not prohibit states from advertising, and therefore the inclusion of advertising in state mailings fell within the governmental function exception to the DPPA.
On appeal, plaintiffs primarily urged that the advertising should be considered apart from the registration reminder. The Eleventh Circuit rejected this dichotomy because even "funding public programs through commercial advertising is a legitimate agency function."
Plaintiffs have since requested the Eleventh Circuit to reconsider this decision en banc. Following a decision by the Circuit, the district court will address the impact of the decision on the remaining cases pending against Imagitas. Imagitas is represented by Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. attorney Stephen Safranski.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.