- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
February 26, 2021Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice Partners Named to Minnesota Lawyer’s Power 30 List
-
February 22, 2021Robins Kaplan Expands Health Care Litigation Group
-
February 1, 2021Meegan Hollywood Selected to Join American Antitrust Institute Advisory Board
-
March 6, 2021With Our Voices 2021 Arc Gala
-
March 6, 20211st Annual Tee It Up for the Troops Winter Outing
-
March, 9, 2021The New Frontier of Software License Disputes
-
Winter 2021Pro Bono Publico–For The Public Good
-
Winter 2021The Case for Charitable Giving
-
Winter 2021The Fictional Wealth Disputes That We Took In and Learned From in 2020
-
February 26, 2021Financial Daily Dose 2.26.2021 | Top Story: Rising Long-Term Bond Yields Blamed for Jumpy Markets
-
February 25, 2021Financial Daily Dose 2.25.2021 | Top Story: McKinsey Ousts Managing Partner on Heels of Opioid Settlement
-
February 24, 2021Financial Daily Dose 2.24.2021 | Top Story: Chair Powell Promises Continued Fed Support for US Economy
Medical Malpractice Case Report: $750,000 settlement for failure to provide prophylactic deep vein thrombosis medication resulting in fatal pulmonary embolism
June 2008
Firm partner Peter A. Schmit achieved a settlement of $725,000,on the behalf of a the family of a 48-year-old man in a failure to diagnose medical malpractice case involving a failure to provide deep vein thrombosis medication leading to pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lung) and death. Read the following Minnesota Association for Justice (MAJ) Minnesota Case Report, Vol.27, No.3, June, 2008
Selected Results*
(Excerpts taken with permission from Minnesota Trial Lawyer Association's (MTLA) "Minnesota Case Reports")
Court: Western North Dakota
B.D. a 48-year old farm laborer, fell and became wedged between two field trucks on March 17, 2004. He was admitted to the local hospital where a CT scan revealed fractures of the sacrum, pubic ramus and inferior ramus. During his hospitalization, B.D. was examined by a physician who noted the need to do intermittent compression of B.D.ís lower extremities for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis rather than use anticoagulants in the acute phase of his injury. A few days later, a different physician examined B.D. who noted that it would take 6-8 weeks to heal well enough to allow B.D. to return to work. B.D. had significant pain from his pelvic fractures. He started physical therapy. Despite the recognition of the need for prophylactic treatment, all B.D. received while hospitalized was Jobst compression to his lower extremities for 20-30 minutes each day. No prophylactic anticoagulation treatment was given during his hospitalization or after discharge. On March 26, B.D. was discharged from the hospital. On March 30, B.D. collapsed. Resuscitation was not successful.
Autopsy revealed B.D. died of an acute pulmonary embolism due to deep vein thrombosis as a complication of pelvic fracture. Plaintiff's experts, board certified specialists in the fields of family practice, trauma and pulmonology, concluded defendants were negligent for failing to appreciate the risk factors for the development of pulmonary embolism and failing to protect B.D. from developing a pulmonary embolism by initiating appropriate deep vein thrombosis prophylactics. As a result, B.D. died.
An issue of some dispute was the level of ambulation B.D. enjoyed prior to discharge from the hospital. Standard of care depends in part on whether patients are able to ambulate at the time of discharge. B.D. was survived by a widow, adult child and minor child. Establishing economic loss was challenging given B.D.'s occupation and the fact that some of the compensation B.D.received was in the form of bartering.
Settlement: $725,000 ($500,000 non-economic cap)
Attorney: Peter A. Schmit , Esq., Robins,Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN (612) 349-8778
Related Professionals
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.