- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 28, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2023 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow and Pathfinder
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
March 2023Unintended Consequences of Banning Noncompete Agreements
March 26, 2023What I’ll Be Watching for in the Amgen Oral Arguments
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Medical Malpractice Case Report: $750,000 settlement for failure to provide prophylactic deep vein thrombosis medication resulting in fatal pulmonary embolism
Firm partner Peter A. Schmit achieved a settlement of $725,000,on the behalf of a the family of a 48-year-old man in a failure to diagnose medical malpractice case involving a failure to provide deep vein thrombosis medication leading to pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lung) and death. Read the following Minnesota Association for Justice (MAJ) Minnesota Case Report, Vol.27, No.3, June, 2008
(Excerpts taken with permission from Minnesota Trial Lawyer Association's (MTLA) "Minnesota Case Reports")
Court: Western North Dakota
B.D. a 48-year old farm laborer, fell and became wedged between two field trucks on March 17, 2004. He was admitted to the local hospital where a CT scan revealed fractures of the sacrum, pubic ramus and inferior ramus. During his hospitalization, B.D. was examined by a physician who noted the need to do intermittent compression of B.D.ís lower extremities for prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis rather than use anticoagulants in the acute phase of his injury. A few days later, a different physician examined B.D. who noted that it would take 6-8 weeks to heal well enough to allow B.D. to return to work. B.D. had significant pain from his pelvic fractures. He started physical therapy. Despite the recognition of the need for prophylactic treatment, all B.D. received while hospitalized was Jobst compression to his lower extremities for 20-30 minutes each day. No prophylactic anticoagulation treatment was given during his hospitalization or after discharge. On March 26, B.D. was discharged from the hospital. On March 30, B.D. collapsed. Resuscitation was not successful.
Autopsy revealed B.D. died of an acute pulmonary embolism due to deep vein thrombosis as a complication of pelvic fracture. Plaintiff's experts, board certified specialists in the fields of family practice, trauma and pulmonology, concluded defendants were negligent for failing to appreciate the risk factors for the development of pulmonary embolism and failing to protect B.D. from developing a pulmonary embolism by initiating appropriate deep vein thrombosis prophylactics. As a result, B.D. died.
An issue of some dispute was the level of ambulation B.D. enjoyed prior to discharge from the hospital. Standard of care depends in part on whether patients are able to ambulate at the time of discharge. B.D. was survived by a widow, adult child and minor child. Establishing economic loss was challenging given B.D.'s occupation and the fact that some of the compensation B.D.received was in the form of bartering.
Settlement: $725,000 ($500,000 non-economic cap)
Attorney: Peter A. Schmit , Esq., Robins,Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN (612) 349-8778
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.