- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
January 20, 2022Robins Kaplan Partners Named to 2022 IAM Strategy 300 Global Leaders Guide
-
January 5, 2022Manleen Singh Promoted to Counsel
-
January 3, 2022Stacey Slaughter and Steve Safranski Named Co-Chairs of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group
-
January 27, 2022Indian Arts and Crafts Acts for Attorneys
-
February 3, 2022Loss Executives Association 91st Annual Meeting & Educational Conference
-
February 3, 2022Loss Executives Association 91st Annual Meeting & Educational Conference
-
January 25, 2022Patrick Arenz | Richard H. Tholen, M.D. v. Assist America, Inc. | $27.8 million verdict
-
January 18, 2022Briefly: A User's Guide for Post-Trial Motions
-
January 17, 2022Is This the End of Mandatory Arbitration? Turning the Tables With Mass Arbitration
-
January 26, 2022Choppy Markets Await Fed Policy Guidance
-
January 25, 2022Markets Rebound on Wild Monday, Confirming Volatility’s Hold
-
January 21, 2022New Fed Report Kicks Off Central Bank Digital Currency Debate
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Georgia-Pacific Swipes Clorox With Patent Suit
March 27, 2008
All Content Copyright 2008, Portfolio Media, Inc.
Paper manufacturer Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP sued Clorox Co. and its subsidiary Armor All/STP Products Co., alleging that the two companies infringed a patent regarding a container made specifically to hold wipes.
IP Law360
READ FULL ARTICLE Related Publications
January 25, 2022
Patrick Arenz | Richard H. Tholen, M.D. v. Assist America, Inc. | $27.8 million verdict
Patrick Arenz - Great Trials Podcast
January 18, 2022
Briefly: A User's Guide for Post-Trial Motions
Eric Magnuson and Caroline Moos - Minnesota Lawyer
January 17, 2022
Is This the End of Mandatory Arbitration? Turning the Tables With Mass Arbitration
David Rochelson - Our Curious Amalgam Podcast, American Bar Association
Fourth Quarter
ANDA Litigation Settlements
GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin
Fourth Quarter
New ANDA Cases
GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin
Related News
January 5, 2022
January 3, 2022
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.