- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
-
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
-
March 10, 2023Robins Kaplan Announces $28 Million Settlement in Case Against For-Profit College’s Directors & Officers
-
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
-
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
-
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
-
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
-
February 22, 2023A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
-
February 7, 2023When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
Bad Faith Claim Denied by South Dakota Supreme Court
November 19, 2007
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. recently obtained an opinion from the South Dakota Supreme Court upholding an insurer's right to challenge fairly debatable insurance claims without being liable for the tort of ‘bad faith'. Mudlin v. Hills Materials Co., 2007 SD 118 (S.D. 2007).
Related Professionals
Related Publications
August 26, 2022
Questions Remain on Computer Fraud Coverage For Phishing
Melissa D'Alelio, Robert Callahan, Jr. - Law360
June 7, 2022
Damned if You Do,
Damned if You Don’t
Damned if You Don’t
Taylore Karpa Schollard - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
June 7, 2022
Take-Home COVID: The New Frontier?
Erica Ramsey - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
June 7, 2022
What’s in a Name?
Michele N. Detherage, Esq. - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
June 7, 2022
Women Leaders Excel
In Times of Crisis:
In Times of Crisis:
Melissa D'Alelio - The Robins Kaplan Insurance Insight
Related News
December 19, 2022
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.