- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 16, 2023Second Circuit Affirms Record $5.6 Billion Recovery in Antitrust Case
March 10, 2023Robins Kaplan Announces $28 Million Settlement in Case Against For-Profit College’s Directors & Officers
March 9, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Launches New Professional Development Program
March 19-22, 2023PLRB 2023 Claims Conference
March 29-30, 2023ACI Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
March 13, 2023The Antitrust Case that Could Reshape Professional Golf
February 22, 2023A World Without Noncompetes: Protecting Confidential Information and Trade Secrets
February 7, 2023When Monkey Business Slips Into Trademark Infringement
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Medical Malpractice Case Report: $1,050,000 for negligence in the performance of minimally invasive spine surgery leads to permanent spine injury.
Firm partner Peter A. Schmit reached a medical malpractice settlement of $1,050,000 for a 52-year-old chemical engineer who suffered permanent spine injury after the negligent performance of minimally invasive spine surgery. Read the following Minnesota Association for Justice Minnesota Case Report:
(Excerpts taken with permission from Minnesota Association for Justice (MAJ) “Minnesota Case Reports”)
BL was a 52-year old chemical engineer from Fargo, North Dakota who developed shoulder pain radiating to his arm. After conservative care failed, BL was referred to MeritCare Neurosurgery and diagnostic scans were performed. The diagnostic scans revealed the need for a foraminotomy in the cervical region to release pressure on an impinged nerve. A minimally invasive technique utilizing the METrX system was recommended. This technique which is relatively new involves a very small incision being made followed by the placement of a sharp surgical instrument called a Steinman pin that is to be placed under fluoroscopic guidance down to the level of bone involvement. Major advantages include a much smaller incision, no surgical splitting of muscles, and a quicker recovery time.
During the procedure, BL’s spinal cord was punctured by the Steinman pin. Following surgery, diagnostic tests revealed an injury to the spinal cord leading to a permanent spinal cord injury. Plaintiff’s expert contended that it was a departure from accepted standards of practice to puncture the spinal cord with the Steinman pin. Thankfully, BL was able to return to his work as a chemical engineer but the injury has impacted his activities of daily living.
Specifically, BL has an impaired gait such that he no longer can fully perform all sporting activities he once did such as running the bases while coaching his son’s baseball team, downhill skiing and walking various golf courses. BL has been diagnosed with a partial cord injury — Brown-Sequard’s syndrome — and a centrally mediated pain syndrome. That means BL’s pain flows outward from his injured spinal cord for which he takes Neurontin. No wage loss was alleged due to BL’s ability to return to work and other than Neurontin, there was no future medical expenses.
B.L. v. Hospital and Clinic
Peter A. Schmit
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.