- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
March 4, 2021Robins Kaplan Files Class Action Against Martin Shkreli and His Former Companies on Behalf of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota
-
March 1, 2021Amy Churan Named an Insurance Trailblazer by National Law Journal
-
March 1, 2021Firm, Partner Recognized by Managing IP
-
March, 9, 2021The New Frontier of Software License Disputes
-
March 9, 2021Health Care Antitrust under President Biden
-
March 11, June 10, and October 7, 2021New York Women in Antitrust Group Spotlight Series
-
Winter 2021Pro Bono Publico–For The Public Good
-
Winter 2021The Case for Charitable Giving
-
Winter 2021The Fictional Wealth Disputes That We Took In and Learned From in 2020
-
March 5, 2021Financial Daily Dose 3.5.2021 | Top Story: Powell Tries to Sooth Jumpy Markets Fearing Weak Jobs Report
-
March 4, 2021Financial Daily Dose 3.4.2021 | Top Story: Google Shakes Up Digital Ad Industry by Phasing Out Web Tracking
-
March 3, 2021Financial Daily Dose 3.3.2021 | Top Story: Rare Merck-J&J Partnership to Boost U.S. Vaccine Production
Minnesota Supreme Court Recognizes Cause of Action Against Hospitals for Negligent Privileging of Physicians
August 2007
(August 2007) Recently the firm represented a client in a case where the Minnesota Supreme Court held that hospitals owe a duty to patients to use reasonable care in granting hospital privileges to physicians. This duty exists even when the physician is not an employee of the hospital. This is the first time that an appellate court in the State of Minnesota has recognized a common law cause of action for negligent privileging. The firm's client was represented by Terry L. Wade.
This case arises from serious injuries suffered by the client after undergoing gastric bypass surgery performed by a doctor in Minnesota. During the course of discovery, it was found that the doctor had a history of educational, training, and practice issues. These issues included a failure to obtain board certification from the American Board of Surgery and a history of malpractice actions, discipline by the board of medical practice in Minnesota and North Dakota, restrictions on privileges by a medical center, and an inability to obtain malpractice insurance in the private sector since the 1980’s.
In its decision, the Supreme Court noted that recognition of the tort of negligent privileging would be a natural extension of well-established common law rights. The Court had previously recognized a hospital’s duty to protect patients from harm by third parties in other settings. In addition, the common law generally, as expressed in the Restatement of Torts, recognized a cause of action for negligent hiring of an independent contractor.
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstated the decision of Wilkin County District Court Judge Gerald Seibel, the trial court judge who initially allowed the negligent privileging claim to go forward. The Court held that recognition of the cause of action would not conflict with the peer review statute. The peer review statute evidenced no intention to abrogate such a cause of action and in fact may recognize such an action.
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals. The case has now been remanded for trial. A trial date will be set in the near future.
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.