- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
January 5, 2022Manleen Singh Promoted to Counsel
-
January 3, 2022Stacey Slaughter and Steve Safranski Named Co-Chairs of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group
-
December 20, 2021Kellie Lerner and Meegan Hollywood Named to the Crain’s Notable Women in Law List
-
1/25/2022, 2/15/2022 and 3/8/2022Youth Frontiers’ 2022 Geometry of a Leader Conference
-
January 27, 2022Indian Arts and Crafts Acts for Attorneys
-
February 3, 2022Loss Executives Association 91st Annual Meeting & Educational Conference
-
January 18, 2022Briefly: A User's Guide for Post-Trial Motions
-
December 21, 2021Is This the End of Mandatory Arbitration?
-
December 2021The Evolution and Practical Application of Genetic Testing
-
January 19, 2022Microsoft to Buy Troubled Video Game Giant Activision Blizzard in $70B Deal
-
January 18, 2022Unilever Makes Bid for GSK Consumer Health
-
January 14, 2022Navient to Forgive $1.7B in Loans Under Settlement Over Predatory Lending
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Read our attorneys' take on the latest news and trends in the legal and business industries.
$141 Million Settlement Reached Between Intergraph Corporation and Hewlett-Packard
January 24, 2005
Intergraph Corporation, represented by the firm, has reached a settlement agreement on all pending patent litigation with Hewlett-Packard Company, including the Company's OEM Clipper case. The terms of the settlement agreement include Hewlett-Packard paying Intergraph $141 million and the dismissal of all pending legal actions between Intergraph and Hewlett-Packard, as well as a cross-license to the other party's patent portfolio. This brings the total settlements to $396 million for Intergraph. Prior settlements were reached with Dell Inc. and Intel for $225 million. A settlement was reached with Gateway Inc. for $10 million and future royalties on Gateway and e-Machines Computer Systems sales. In addition, settlements were reached with IBM for $10 million and a cross license and with AMD for $10 million plus up to $5 million per year for three years.
Related Publications
October 26, 2021
Simple Steps to Protecting Confidential Information in the Global Economy
David Prange - Managing IP
July 15, 2021
Biotechnology & Trade Secret Protection
Sharon Roberg-Perez, David Prange, Ellen Levish - Bloomberg Law
June 8, 2021
Written Description in the Life Sciences: The Devil is in the Details
Sharon Roberg-Perez, William Jones - IPWatchdog
May 5, 2021
Bio-Rad Ruling Highlights IP Assignment Clause Limits
Bryan J. Vogel, Derrick J. Carman - Law360
March 26, 2021
Trends In Video Game Company Quests To Arbitrate Cases
Matthew Woods, Austin Miller - Law360
Related News
November 22, 2021
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Finds Transitional Patent Eligible for PGR, Invalidates Claims, and Rejects Novel Argument That Bankruptcy Stay Ran out the PTAB Clock
Jake Holdreith, Chris Pinahs, Cy Morton, Oren Langer, Kelsey McElveen, Emily Tremblay and Alice Ribbens
September 20, 2021
Back to Top
Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.