- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
March 18, 2024Robins Kaplan Named Minnesota Firm of The Year by Benchmark Litigation
-
March 12, 2024Anthony Froio Elected Chair of Executive Board and Managing Partner of Robins Kaplan
-
March 12, 2024Robins Kaplan Recognized in 2024 World Trademark Review 1000
-
March 17-20, 2024PLRB 2024 Claims Conference
-
March 26, 2024Generative AI Generates Debate
-
May 2-3, 2024ACI Advanced Forum on Managed Care Disputes and Litigation
-
March 2024Do We Have to Share That Information? Attorney-Client Privilege in the Multi-Entity Context
-
March 2024Sellers of a Business: Know Thyself.
-
March 2024Unintended Consequences: Don’t Forget the Litigation Risks When Getting a Deal Done
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Update on DOL Fiduciary Rule
BY MICHAEL REIF
Fall 2021
President Obama and his Department of Labor revived the concept of the fiduciary rule in April of 2015. The subsequent rulemaking process included thousands of pages of commentary, petitions, and days of hearings that ultimately resulted in the April 2016 final rule, which bore an effective date of June 9, 2017, and envisioned a phase-in period through January 1, 2018. The new rule expanded ERISA’s definition of an “investment advice fiduciary,” and it automatically characterized all financial professionals working with retirement plans or giving retirement planning advice as fiduciaries—a status that bound them legally and ethically to a heightened standard. This approach differed from the original rule in two important ways. First, it embodied a “functional approach” to defining investment advice rather than characterizing advice as subject to the rule simply because it was offered by a registered investment advisor (RIA). Second, it loosened the advice requirements, eliminating the needs-focused tailoring and mandating only that the investment advice be directed to the plan, beneficiary, or participant.
Despite the years-long roll-out, enactment of the final rule prompted impacted institutions to prepare for the realities of the rule. Many lobbied against it even as they spent time and money preparing for its ultimate implementation. Even after it was final, the rule continued to be the subject of debate, analysis, scrutiny, and angst, prompting legislative proposals to revoke or rewrite the statutory definition and related exemptions and to delay the rule’s implementation altogether.
The regulatory landscape shifted dramatically, however, with the election of Donald Trump in 2016. Just weeks after taking office, President Trump issued an executive order instructing the Department of Labor review the rule. New Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta soon officially delayed implementing the rule in spring and summer 2017, directed his department to accept additional public comment on it, and eventually pushed back full implementation to July 1, 2019.
While facing this hostility from within the very department that had issued it, the rule was also the subject to multiple external challenges, including a variety of lawsuits that focused on its fundamental legitimacy. Eventually, in March 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the rule altogether in a 2-1 decision that found the rule “unreasonabl[e]” and determined that the DOL had engaged in “an arbitrary and capricious exercise of administrative power” when it enacted the rule in 2016.
Amid the uncertainty created by the 5th Circuit’s ruling, the DOL enacted a temporary enforcement policy that remained in effect until the summer of 2020, when the department released what could be fairly seen as a compromise position. That 2020 guidance formally reinstated the investment advice fiduciary definition in effect since 1975 but added new interpretations that extended its reach regarding retirement accounts—specifically for rollover scenarios—and also proposed a new exemption for conflicted investment advice and principal transactions. In December of 2020, toward the end of the Trump administration, the Department of Labor officially adopted this third effort, and the incoming Biden administration allowed it to become official on February 16, 2021. The still-temporary enforcement policy is scheduled to sunset on December 20, 2021, though the DOL—known for its at-times late action—could still extend the life of the compromise measure even as it debates the prospect of a new rule that hews more closely to the 2016 standard.
Related Professionals
Michael D. Reif
Partner
Related Publications
Related News
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.