- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Entertainment and Media Litigation
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
December 5, 2024Jake Holdreith Named to Twin Cities Business Top 100
-
December 4, 2024Robins Kaplan Obtains $10.5 Million Post-Verdict in Landmark Aerosol Dust Remover Abuse Case
-
December 2, 2024Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2025 Partners
-
December 12, 2024Strategies for Licensing AI: A Litigation Perspective
-
December 11, 20242024 Year in Review: eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence
-
December 4, 2024Trust & Estate Litigation in Minnesota
-
December 2024A Landmark Victory for Disabled Homeless Veterans: Q&A with the Trial Team
-
November 8, 2024Trademark tensions on the track: Court upholds First Amendment protections in Haas v. Steiner
-
November 8, 2024Destination Skiing And The DOJ's Mountain Merger Challenge
-
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
-
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
-
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Travis K. Waller
Travis K. Waller
Associate
Experience
Travis brings a sophisticated understanding of policy and the law, a breadth of experience, and a keen eye for detail to the matters he handles. This equates to superlative client representation firmly rooted in the fundamentals of litigation yet adapted to suit a client’s needs in an ever-changing legal landscape.
Travis’s practice primarily focuses on intellectual property litigation, particularly patent litigation. His experience covers a wide range of technologies and industries, including biotechnology and the life sciences, as well as battery technology, lighting, software, and telecommunications. Travis has worked with Fortune 500 companies, as well as private inventors, both domestically and abroad, and across a diverse array of venues.
Railware, Inc. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, No. 1:22-cv-05013-KPF (S.D.N.Y)
A patent enforcement matter in the Southern District of New York involving train traffic control systems.
Celgard, LLC v. Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. LTD (US) Research Institute, et al., No. 4:22-cv-00594-JST (N.D. Cal.)
A patent enforcement matter in the Northern District of California involving battery separator technology.
Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine et al. v. Imstem BioTechnology, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-12239-ADB (D.Mass.); Astellas Institute for Regenerative Medicine v. ImStem BioTechnology, Inc., Nos. 22-1623, 22-1702 (Fed. Cir.)
A patent inventorship matter in the District of Massachusetts involving mesenchymal stem cells, which resulted in one of the first virtual bench trials to occur during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Wangs Alliance Corporation v. CAST Lighting, LLC, No. 2:20-cv-03710-MCA-MAH (D.N.J.); CAST Lighting, LLC v. Wangs Alliance Corporation, PGR2021-00012 (P.T.A.B.)
A patent enforcement matter in the District of New Jersey involving LED lighting, and defense of a post-grant review proceeding before the USPTO regarding the same.
United Access Techs., LLC v. Frontier Commc'ns Corp. et al., No. 1:11-cv-00341-KAJ (D. Del.)
A patent defense matter for a Fortune 500 company in the District of Delaware involving DSL technology.
AGW Sono Partners, LLC v. Downtown Soho, LLC, 343 Conn. 309, 273 A.3d 186 (2022)
A matter of first impression before the Connecticut Supreme Court on the scope and application of defenses to contract performance (e.g., impossibility, frustration of purpose, etc.) premised on Connecticut’s pandemic related executive orders.
- Named a “Minnesota Rising Star,” Super Lawyers (2024)
- Named a “New York Rising Star,” by Super Lawyers (2022-2024)
- Named a “North Star Lawyer” by the Minnesota State Bar Association for providing at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services (2023)
- Named “Outstanding Editor,” by Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (2017)
- Minnesota Justice Foundation Public Service Distinction (2017)
- Connecticut
- Minnesota
- New York
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
- U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
- University of Minnesota Law School, intellectual property and technology concentration (2017); Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Managing Editor (2016-2017); Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Articles Editor (2016-2017)
- University of North Dakota, B.A. in English and Linguistics, cum laude (2014)
- Connecticut Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section: Executive Board, Legislative Liaison (2024-Present); Secretary (2021-2024); YLS Liaison (2020-2021)
- Connecticut Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section: IP Legislation Subcommittee, Chair (2024-Present); Vice Chair (2020-2024)
- Connecticut Bar Association, Young Lawyers Section: Executive Board, Intellectual Property Chair (2020-2021)
- American Bar Association, Young Lawyers Division, Connecticut Delegate to the YLD Assembly (2020-2021)
- Generative AI Generates Debate: AI and Copyright Infringement
Connecticut Bar Association, Webinar (March 26, 2024)
RESOURCES
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.