Mr. Wildfang has experience in antitrust litigation and counseling for over 30 years. He has represented parties in many private civil antitrust actions in industries ranging from insurance to agricultural commodities and has counselled clients on a wide variety of antitrust and trade regulation issues from mergers and joint ventures to marketing and sales programs.
From 1993 to 1996, Mr. Wildfang served as Special Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. In that position he was responsible for advising the Assistant Attorney General on the Justice Department's complex civil antitrust litigation, as well as managing certain high-profile cases. Among other matters, Mr. Wildfang directed the Justice Department's efforts in the civil action against Nasdaq securities firms for price-fixing (United States v. Alex Brown & Sons, et al., S.D.N.Y. No. 96 Civ. 5313), the government's action challenging international anticompetitive intellectual property licenses (United States v. Pilkington PLC, et al., D.Ariz. No. 94-345), as well as being involved in the government's investigation of anticompetitive practices by Visa and Master Card in the credit card industry.
In 2007, Mr. Wildfang served as a member of the American Antitrust Institute's Department of Justice Transition Committee for the incoming Obama Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. In that capacity the AAI Transition Committee Report "DOJ Cartel Enforcement: Appraisal and Proposals" was submitted to the Administration.
Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP, he was a partner at another firm in Minneapolis, where he practiced in antitrust litigation, business litigation, and health care law.
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Litigation, 05-MD-1720 (MKB)(JO): Robins Kaplan, serving as plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel, recently reached a $6.25 billion antitrust settlement on behalf of a class of over 10 million U.S. merchants who have accepted Visa and Mastercard credit cards and debit cards for the purchase of goods and services. The defendants include Visa and Mastercard, as well as major card-issuing banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, and Capital One. The settlement, which is subject to possible reduction of up to $700 million in the event opt-outs exceed a certain threshold, is believed to be the largest-ever antitrust class action settlement. The settlement was filed with the District Court on a request for preliminary approval on September 18, 2018.
Kirk Dahl, et al. v. Bain Capital Partners, LLC et al., No. 07-cv-12388 (D. Mass.): Co-lead counsel representing public shareholders of target companies taken private in large leveraged buyouts in a class action suit against the largest private equity firms who allegedly conspired to suppress the acquisition prices for the target companies.
In re: Visa/MasterCard Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1575. Represented Best Buy, Inc. and Darden Restaurants (Red Lobster, Olive Garden) in antitrust challenge to anticompetitive conduct of Visa and MasterCard credit card networks.
Represented large agribusiness clients who were opt-out plaintiffs in In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1285 (D.D.C.). The Vitamins litigation arose out of a decade-long price-fixing cartel of the major international vitamin manufacturers, and involved vigorously contested disputes regarding jurisdiction, foreign discovery, conspiracy, damages and expert issues. Clients included Land O' Lakes, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation, CHS Co-Operatives, Gold'n Plump Poultry, and other large vitamin purchasers. The cases settled after discovery was complete, but before trial, for in excess of $250,000,000.
In In re Methionine Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1311, (N.D. Cal.), represented many of the same large agribusiness clients as in In re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation. Involved a challenge to international price-fixing cartel. Settled for $35,000,000.
From 1995 until 1998, Mr. Wildfang was the lead counsel for 22 plaintiffs in the case of Concord Boat Co., et al. v. Brunswick Corp. (See reported decisions at 21 F. Supp.2d 923, 34 F. Supp.2d 1125 (E.D. Ark. 1998)). The case involved cutting edge antitrust claims of restraint of trade, monopolization and unlawful mergers. After a 10 week trial, on June 19, 1998 the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs on all counts, and awarded damages of $133,000,000, plus attorneys fees. The jury's verdict was reversed on appeal, 207 F.3d 1039 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 979 (2000) on grounds later rejected in a Third Circuit case pursuing a similar legal theory (Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP).
In re Workers' Compensation Ins. Antitrust Litig., (D.Minn. 4-85-1166), 574 F. Supp. 525 (D.Minn. 1983); 867 F.2d 1552 (8th Cir.); cert. denied, 492 U.S. 920 (1989); 130 F.R.D. 99 (D.Minn. 1990); 771 F. Supp. 284 (D.Minn. 1991) (Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP), a precedent-setting case involving both the McCarran-Ferguson Act exemption for insurance companies, as well as the State Action Doctrine.
Midwestern Mach. Co., et al. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., (D.Minn. 97-1438), 990 F. Supp.2d 1128 (D.Minn. 1998); rev'd, 167 F.3d 439 (8th Cir. 1999) (Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP).
- Apple's Threat to Visa, MasterCard, Citigroup and Bank of America
- The Threat From Europe for Visa, MasterCard and the Banks
- American Banker
- American Lawyer Litigation Daily
- KDOW Radio
- Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal
- News Night Minnesota (Minnesota Public Television)
- New York Times Blog
- Payments Journal
- Portland Press Herald
- Sacramento Bee
- St. Louis Post-Dispatch
- Star Tribune
- Thomson Reuters News & Insight
- TH Online
- WCCO Radio
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.