- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
May 12, 2022Robins Kaplan Practice Group, Attorney Recognized in Elite Trial Lawyers Awards
-
May 9, 2022Six Partners Recognized as “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property
-
May 4, 2022Robins Kaplan LLP Relocates Silicon Valley Office
-
May 26, 2022Democracy’s Last Line of Defense
-
June 2, 2022Hennepin County Bar Foundation 2022 Bar Benefit
-
June 2, 2022Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers 2022 Stepping Up Breakfast
-
May 19, 202211th Circ. Ban On Service Awards May Inhibit Class Actions
-
May 13, 2022Trademark Applications and the Murky Waters of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
-
May 5, 2022Antitrust Law As A Tool Against Privacy Abuses
-
May 24, 2022Broadcom Weighing $60B Bid for Hybrid Cloud Co. VMWare
-
May 20, 2022China Unexpectedly Cuts Key Benchmark Rate in Attempt to Jump-Start Flagging Economy
-
May 19, 2022Inflation-Battered Retailers Spur Vast Market Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Gary L. Wilson

Gary L. Wilson
Partner

Experience
- Robins Kaplan LLP, 1986-present.
- Practice focuses on complex litigation, including plaintiff-side product liability matters, commercial disputes, and appellate litigation.
Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel in Abilify Multi-District Litigation
Counsel in In re Chantix Litigation MDL. Represented plaintiffs and developed experts in products liability action leading to a global settlement.
Counsel in Charbonneau v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.. Represented plaintiffs in first Mirapex products liability bellwether trial. On July 30, 2008, jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $8,279,300, including $7.8 million in punitive damages for failing to warn of risk of compulsive behaviors, including pathological gambling, from the Parkinson's drug Mirapex.
Counsel in Zwayer v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.. Represented plaintiffs in second Mirapex bellwether trial. Case was confidentially settled prior to closing argument.
One of the partners heading the firm's litigation on behalf of persons injured by Vioxx.
One of the partners leading the firm's litigation representing clients injured by the St. Jude mechanical heart valve.
One of the attorneys who represented the State of Minnesota and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota against the tobacco industry.
Worked on the litigation concerning the defective Bjork-Shiley artificial heart valve.
One of the attorneys who represented the Government of India against Union Carbide regarding the Bhopal India gas disaster.

- Named a “2013 Top Rated Lawyer in Mass Torts,” American Lawyer
- Named a "Litigation Star," Benchmark Litigation (2013, 2016 editions)
- Recognized as “AV-Preeminent” by Martindale-Hubbell
- California
- Minnesota
- Wisconsin
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
- U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
- U.S. District Court, Minnesota
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana
- U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri
- University of Wisconsin Law School, J.D., with honors, Order of the Coif (1986); Articles Editor, Wisconsin Law Review
- University of Wisconsin, B.A.
- American Law Institute, Elected Member
- American Law Institute, Consultant Group of Aggregate Litigation
- American Law Institute, Consultant Group on Tort Law
- American Association for Justice
- Minnesota Association for Justice
- International Bar Association
- Minnesota State Bar Association (Food and Drug Committee)
- Benicar Settlement Update
Mass Torts Made Perfect, Las Vegas, Nevada (October 19, 2017) - Hypothetical Ethics Exercise: Preserving Privilege in a Food, Drug or Medical Device Case
Panelist, HB Litigation Conference: Food, Drug and Medical Device Litigation Forum, Minneapolis, Minnesota (April 24, 2012) - Ghostwriters, Buried Data and Other Big Pharma Tricks: Tools and Dissecting and Revealing Errors in Published Clinical Drug Trials
Minnesota Association for Justice, Alexandria, Minnesota (August 13, 2011) - Hypothetical Ethics Exercise Preserving Privilege in a Food Drug or Medical Device Case
Minnesota Institute of Legal Education, Minneapolis, MN (May 22, 2003) - Hypothetical Ethics Exercise Preserving Privilege in a Food Drug or Medical Device Case
Faculty Presenter, Minnesota Trial Lawyers' Association, Minneapolis, MN (May 14, 1999) - Hypothetical Ethics Exercise Preserving Privilege in a Food Drug or Medical Device Case
Minnesota Law and Politics, Minneapolis, MN (April 11, 1999) - Hypothetical Ethics Exercise Preserving Privilege in a Food Drug or Medical Device Case
Faculty Presenter, Minnesota Law and Politics, Minneapolis, MN (September 8, 1997)
RESOURCES
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.