- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Fiduciary Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
March 30, 2023Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Robins Kaplan Partner Tara Sutton Give Opening Statements in Minnesota’s Lawsuit Against JUUL
March 28, 2023Robins Kaplan LLP Announces 2023 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow and Pathfinder
March 22, 2023Benchmark Litigation Names Robins Kaplan 2023 Minnesota Law Firm of the Year
April 3, 2023Conference of Tribal Lending Commissioners
April 11-13, 2023Mass Torts Made Perfect Seminar
April 19, 2023FBA Women in MDL, Mass and Class Leadership
March 2023Unintended Consequences of Banning Noncompete Agreements
March 26, 2023What I’ll Be Watching for in the Amgen Oral Arguments
March 2023How an Investor Can Lose More Than Just Their Investment
September 16, 2022Uber Company Systems Compromised by Widespread Cyber Hack
September 15, 2022US Averts Rail Workers Strike With Last-Minute Tentative Deal
September 14, 2022Hotter-Than-Expected August Inflation Prompts Massive Wall Street Selloff
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Thomas J. Undlin
Thomas Undlin has experience in an array of complex business disputes including antitrust, breach-of-contract, fraud, securities, and intellectual property claims. He has practiced in a wide range of jurisdictions including state and federal courts in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, New York, Texas, and California, as well as varied sponsoring agencies for both domestic and international arbitration and dispute resolution. As co-lead counsel, Mr. Undlin played a key role in Kirk Dahl, et al. v. Bain Capital Partners, LLC et al., a class action suit against some of the world’s largest private equity firms for a conspiracy to suppress the buyout price for public companies, with total settlements of nearly $600 million. Mr. Undlin is also a co-lead counsel in In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Litigation, since its inception in 2005. Mr. Undlin and his team secured a $5.6 billion class settlement in the historic litigation in September 2018. The settlement, which was granted final approval in December 2019 and affirmed on appeal in March 2023, represents the largest settlement of a private antitrust action in the 130-year history of the Sherman Act.
According to Chambers, Mr. Undlin “is a first-class lawyer and wonderful adviser.”
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1720 (E.D.N.Y.): Serving as court-appointed co-lead counsel, Robins Kaplan reached a $5.6 billion antitrust class action settlement on behalf of a class of more than 10 million U.S. merchants who accepted Visa and Mastercard credit and debit cards for the purchase of goods and services. Plaintiffs alleged that Visa and Mastercard, as well as major card-issuing banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, and Capital One, violated antitrust laws and charged merchants who accept credit and debit cards supra-competitive fees on card transactions. The settlement, which was granted final approval in December of 2019 and affirmed on appeal in March of 2023, represents the largest settlement of a private antitrust action in the 130-year history of the Sherman Act.
Kirk Dahl, et al. v. Bain Capital Partners, LLC et al., No. 07-cv-12388 (D. Mass.): Co-lead counsel representing public shareholders of target companies taken private in large leveraged buyouts in a class action suit against the largest private equity firms who allegedly conspired to suppress the acquisition prices for the target companies.
Omnicare, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.: Represented defendants UnitedHealth Group, Inc. and PacifiCare, Inc. in an antitrust lawsuit involving alleged price-fixing and fraud related to prescription drug reimbursement under the federal Medicare Part D program. Plaintiff Omnicare sought damages exceeding $1 billion and permanent injunctive relief. After summary judgment motion was argued in August 2008, the U.S. District Court granted summary judgment to defendants on all claims in January 2009. Published decision: Omnicare, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 594 F. Supp. 2d 945 (N.D. Ill. 2009). Summary judgment was subsequently affirmed. Omnicare, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 629 F.3d 697 (7th Cir. 2011).
Powell Protection Systems, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores, L.P. (Dallas County, Texas): Lead trial counsel in defense of action claiming interference with contract and fraud relating to a home audio/video/security wiring program (2007).
Game Financial Corporation v. Global Cash Access (Minnesota, Hennepin County): Lead plaintiff’s counsel in action for interference with contract and prospective business relations (June 2004).
Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. Premier Retail Networks, Inc. (Case No. 01-1271, 1272, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit): Defense counsel in action leading to reversal of default judgment and order for preliminary injunction in patent infringement action (September, 2002).
Racal NCS, Inc. v. Alliant Techsystems Inc., The Raytheon Group, Hughes Aircraft Company (Miami, Florida) (AAA International Centre for Dispute Resolution): Defense trial counsel before an international tribunal in a contract dispute relating to an underwater sonar device (December, 2002).
VirtualFund.com v. Melvin Masters (Minnesota, Hennepin County): Lead litigation counsel in shareholder derivative action and related proxy battle (March, 2002).
Carlson Hospitality Group, Inc. v. Diversey Lever, Inc. (Minnesota, Hennepin County): Lead counsel in dispute over vendor supply agreement (October, 2002).
Lockheed Martin Environmental Systems v. Alliant Techsystems Inc. (California, Los Angeles County): Lead trial counsel for defendant in action claiming breach of contract and changed conditions relating to environmental clean-up project at China Lake Naval Weapons Base (August, 1999).
Mission Technologies v. Alliant Techsystems Inc. (Texas, Federal Court): Lead defense counsel in matter claiming theft of trade secrets and breach of contract relating to unmanned aerial vehicle (1999).
Peterson v. Fluegel (Minnesota, Dakota County): Plaintiffs’ trial counsel in professional negligence action (January, 1999).
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Golden Triangle (Minnesota, Federal Court) (121 F.3d 351 (8th Cir. 1997)): Trial counsel in defense of claims for fraud and breach-of-contract relating to commercial property sales to a real estate investment trust.
KPMG-Piper Fund Litigation (Minnesota, Federal Court): Defense counsel in securities and accounting fraud class action (1995).
- The Best Lawyers in America: Litigation - Intellectual Property (2023 Edition)
- Benchmark Litigation: Litigation Star (2020-2023 Editions)
- Chambers USA: Antitrust, Minnesota (2022)
- U.S. District Court, Minnesota
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court
- William Mitchell College of Law, J.D., cum laude (1987)
- St. Olaf College, B.A., Political Science
- American Bar Association (Litigation Section)
- Minnesota State Bar Association
- Hennepin County Bar Association
- "Wisconsin farmers attend NFU Convention," Morning AgClips (March 13, 2023)
- "DOJ pledges to fight ag antitrust cases, even when 'law is challenging'," Agri-Pulse (March 8, 2023)
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.