- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Ediscovery
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Litigation Support Services
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
-
January 26, 2021Robins Kaplan Welcomes New Diversity and Inclusion Director
-
January 25, 2021Robins Kaplan Files U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief on Behalf of Former U.S. Attorneys
-
January 25, 2021David Martinez Named 2021 Minority Leader of Influence
-
January 28, 2021COVID-19: The Show Did Not Go On
-
February 9, 2021Smart Phone Privacy and Data Security – How to Assess and Minimize Risk in the Current Reality
-
March 6, 2021With Our Voices 2021 Arc Gala
-
Fourth QuarterANDA Approvals
-
Fourth QuarterANDA Litigation Settlements
-
Fourth QuarterGeneric Launches
-
January 26, 2021Financial Daily Dose 1.26.2021 | Top Story: Apollo Global Ousts Leon Black as CEO Over Epstein Ties
-
January 25, 2021Financial Daily Dose 1.25.2021 | Top Story: Merck Abandons Covid Vaccine Effort Over Ineffective Results
-
January 22, 2021Financial Daily Dose 1.22.2021 | Top Story: Google Threatens to Pull Search From Down Under Over Proposed Law
David B. Rochelson

David B. Rochelson
Associate

Experience
Dave Rochelson focuses his practice on prosecuting complex antitrust class actions involving price fixing, unlawful monopolization, and other anticompetitive practices. He has represented clients through every stage of litigation, from performing pre-suit evaluations, drafting complaints, and discovery through to summary judgment, mediation, and settlement.
Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP, Dave worked as a commercial litigator at a large New York law firm where he focused on antitrust as well as securities and insurance matters. From 2013-2014, he served as a judicial law clerk to the Hon. William H. Walls of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Before attending law school, Dave worked in the Obama White House and was the head broadcast writer for the ABC News program Nightline.
Represent a class of direct purchasers in a case alleging a decade-long scheme to falsify efficacy data and maintain a monopoly in the market for the mumps vaccine. In re Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation, No. 12-cv-3555 (E.D. Pa.).
Represent a class of direct purchasers in a case alleging that Keurig engaged in an anticompetitve scheme to exclude competition in the market for coffee “portion packs” that work in its single-serve brewers, leading to higher prices and reduced choice for consumers. In Re: Keurig Green Mountain Single Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation, No.14-md-2542 (S.D.N.Y.).
Represent a class of indirect purchasers in the long-running Auto Parts antitrust litigation, which has secured over $1.3 billion in recoveries for purchasers of vehicles. In re Auto Parts Antitrust Litigation, No. 12-md-2311 (E.D. Mi.)
Secured dismissal for electronic fixed income trading company in an antitrust class action alleging a conspiracy to restrain trade. In re Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:16-md-2704 (S.D.N.Y.). (Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP.)
Represented trade association facing treble damages for alleged participation in a conspiracy to restrain trade by allegedly refusing to license its intellectual property. Oversaw all stages of discovery, prepared the settlement agreement and advised the client on compliance with that agreement. In re Credit Default Swaps Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:13-md-02476 (S.D.N.Y.). (Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP.)
Successfully overturned a rule of practice in Bronx County Family Court which violated the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution in pro bono impact litigation. Working with the Bronx Defenders, drafted all appellate briefing and secured unanimous reversal from the Appellate Division First Department. In re Sean M., Bronx Fam. Ct. No. N-31309/15. (Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP.)
Secured reversal of pro bono client’s conviction for illegal weapon possession. Working with the Office of the Appellate Defender, drafted all appellate briefs and argued the case before the Appellate Division First Department. People v. Gordian, Bronx Sup. Ct. No. 1407/07. (Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP.)
- New York
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
- New York University School of Law, J.D., cum laude (2012)
- Harvard University, A.B., cum laude in English and American Literature and Language (2005)
- ABA Antitrust Law Section Pricing Conduct Committee, Young Lawyer Representative (2020-2021)
- ABA Antitrust Law Section Committee for Competition Laws Outside the United States, Young Lawyer Representative (2018-2020)
- ABA Cartel & Joint Conduct Review, Managing Editor (2018)
- American Bar Association - Antitrust Section
- New York State Bar Association - Antitrust Section
- The Fix Is In! How to Investigate and Litigate Price Fixing Cases
Moderator, American Bar Association, Webinar (December 8, 2020) - Becoming an Antitrust Attorney
Panelist, NYSBA, Cardozo Law School, New York, New York (February 20, 2019)
RESOURCES
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.