John K. Harting

612.349.8787

Experience

John primarily focuses his practice on intellectual property-related litigation. Representing clients on both sides of the “v,” and in forums including district courts, the International Trade Commission (ITC), and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), John has helped his clients obtain over $100 million in settlements and judgments while also successfully defending against large-scale patent infringement allegations. John has participated in five patent infringement trials venued across the United States and in the ITC. Those trials included representing a Fortune 100 company as a defendant in a multi-phased trial in the Eastern District of Texas, representing a patent owner in an eight-day evidentiary hearing at the ITC, and representing a patent owner in a four-week patent infringement trial culminating in a successful jury verdict, damages award, and a permanent injunction against 60 different products. The verdict was summarily affirmed by the Federal Circuit. John has represented clients ranging in size from independent inventors to Fortune 100 companies, in matters involving numerous different technologies related to semiconductors, telecommunications, medical devices, point-of-sale and payment processing, wireless communications standards, as well as USB and computer-graphics related technologies.

John seeks to provide maximum benefit to his clients by gaining a complete understanding of their business and litigation goals and then working together with the client to develop an appropriate strategy to achieve them.

John attended law school at the University of Minnesota, where he graduated magna cum laude, Order of the Coif. While in law school, John spent two years as a certified student attorney in the Robins Kaplan Civil Practice Clinic. As a certified student attorney, John represented numerous clients across a broad spectrum of civil litigation-related areas of law, including first-chairing a two-day bench trial in Hennepin County District Court that resulted in a complete win for his client.

John also previously worked as a Judicial Extern to the Honorable John R. Tunheim, U.S. District Court, Minnesota, and a research assistant to Associate Dean Alexandra Klass. As a research assistant to Associate Dean Klass, John helped research and write numerous law review articles and textbook chapters related to complex areas of natural resource and renewable energies law.

Advanced Micro Devices v. LG Electronics (N.D. Cal. No. 14-cv-01012): Represented plaintiff AMD in patent infringement litigation against LGE in the Northern District of California. Asserted infringement of nine patents covering a wide array of computer-based technologies critical to today’s high-end consumer electronics products, including patents claiming pioneering inventions in USB, GPU, thermal management, and graphics-related technologies. Case involved over 800 accused products, ranging from televisions to smartphones, BD players, projectors, and smart appliances. Successfully resolved after Markman and prior to summary judgment.

PCT International, Inc. v. Holland Electronics, LLC (D. Ariz. No. 12-cv-01797): Represented privately owned telecommunications company in patent infringement case litigated in the District of Arizona against competitor company. Asserted infringement of patent claiming an improved coaxial cable end connector. Second-chaired four-week-long jury trial resulting in reasonable royalty award, finding of infringement by 60 products, and permanent injunction against said 60 products. Verdict was summarily affirmed by the Federal Circuit (Dkt. No. 16-1061).

Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores L.P. (E.D. Tex. No. 2:13-cv-00002-MHS-CMC): Represented Fortune 100 retailer against patent infringement claims filed in the Eastern District of Texas. The plaintiff alleged infringement of two patents, and sought more than $125 million in damages.  The case settled three days prior to a jury trial on infringement, after separate trials on invalidity and inequitable conduct. In total, the litigation spanned more than three years and involved numerous issues unique to the prepaid card industry.

Edge Capture L.L.C. et al. v. Barclays Bank PLC, et al. (N.D. Ill. No. 09-cv-1521): Represented independent software vendor in the Northern District of Illinois in patent infringement matter involving automated trading technology. The claims against all defendants were resolved successfully before trial.

Spine Solutions, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., et al. (W.D. Tenn. No. 07-cv-2175): Represented defendant Medtronic in the Western District of Tennessee against infringement allegations filed by Spine Solutions related to Medtronic's artificial lumbar discs. After trial and appeal, the Federal Circuit remanded back to the district court for resolution of damages issues. The matter resolved successfully before the second trial.

  • Named a "North Star Lawyer" by the Minnesota State Bar Association for providing at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services (2013-2014)
  • Alzheimer’s Association, Young Champions Advocacy Committee
Bar Admissions
  • Minnesota
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, Minnesota
Education
  • University of Minnesota Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif (2011); Managing Editor, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (2010-2011)
  • University of Minnesota, B.S. in Environmental Sciences, Policies and Management and Minor in Applied Economics (2008)
Professional Associations
  • Federal Bar Association
  • Minnesota State Bar Association
  • Hennepin County Bar Association
  • Success in Patent Disputes
    University of Minnesota School of Law Student Intellectual Property Law Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota (April 11, 2018)
Back to Top