Line design
By Oren Langer, Christopher Pinahs, Patrick Griffin, Demitri Dawson, and Christy May

This quarterly issue of the GENERICally Speaking campaign provides you and your company with some of the knowledge beneficial to remaining attentive to the complexity of ANDA patent litigation.

In this issue:

  • Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.
    Invega Sustenna® (paliperidone palmitate)
    On appeal for the second time, the Federal Circuit rejected generic manufacturer’s arguments that the district court erred in failing to apply a presumption of obviousness and otherwise finding that there was no motivation to combine or reasonable expectation of success.
  • Mallinckrodt plc v. Airgas Therapeutics LLC
    INOmax® (nitric oxide)
    (On the eve of trial, the court considered and ruled on multiple summary judgment and Daubert motions.
  • Radius Health, Inc. v. Orbicular Pharm. Techs. Private Ltd.
    Tymlos® (abaloparatide)
    After a ten-day bench trial, the court issued findings of facts and conclusions of law finding valid claims in all of the asserted patents.
  • Novo Nordisk, Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.
    Wegovy® (semaglutide)
    In view of the proposed generic product label, the court granted defendant’s Rule 12(c) motion and entered judgment of no direct, contributory, and induced infringement of the asserted patent under § 271(e)(2)(A).
  • In re Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) Patent Litigation (Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. MSN Pharms. Inc.)
    Entresto® (sacubitril / valsartan)
    The unreliability of plaintiff’s reference standard to determine infringement, combined with an adverse inference for plaintiff’s failure to produce the sample, led the court to conclude that plaintiff did not meet its burden to prove infringed by a preponderance of the evidence.
  • In re Selenious Acid Litigation
    Selenious Acid
    After finding that defendants were not likely to succeed on their Section 112 defenses and that Plaintiff would be irreparably harmed if defendants launched their generic products, the court entered a preliminary injunction.

Relevant ANDA Updates highlighted in this issue:

ANDA Approvals

ANDA Litigation Settlements

Generic Launches

New ANDA Cases

Related Attorneys

GENERICally Speaking Hatch Waxman Bulletin

Jump to Page

Robins Kaplan LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek