Patent Owners Now Estopped From Relying On PTAB Estoppel | Resources | Robins Kaplan LLP Law Firm

April 22, 2016

Law360, New York (April 22, 2016, 10:40 AM ET) -- A recent Federal Circuit decision on a writ of mandamus as to the scope of the estoppel provided in 35 U.S.C § 315(e) appears to be contrary to the scope that practitioners and the legislators had in mind when the America Invents Act was passed.

All Content © 2003‐2016, Portfolio Media, Inc.

The articles on our website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or official position of Robins Kaplan LLP.

Disclaimer

Law360

READ FULL ARTICLE

Cyrus A. Morton

Partner

Chair, Patent Office Trials Group

Ryan M. Schultz

Prior Partner

November 16, 2021

Fintiv Denials in Drug Cases

Steven C. Carlson

September 22, 2019

Weaponizing IPRs

Landslide

September 14, 2018

Tallying Repetitive Inter Partes Review Challenges

Law360

June 21, 2018

When Will The ITC Honor A PTAB Finding Of Invalidity?

Law360

March 2018

Assessing Patent Strength Using Data Driven Inputs: Characteristics Of Patents And Patent Owners That Drive Success In Inter Partes Review

Les Nouvelles

VIEW ALL

April 10, 2023

Sherry Roberg-Perez Named to Twin Cities Business' Notable Women in STEM List

November 22, 2021

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Finds Transitional Patent Eligible for PGR, Invalidates Claims, and Rejects Novel Argument That Bankruptcy Stay Ran out the PTAB Clock

July 8, 2020

Robins Kaplan Receives High Ranks from Managing Intellectual Property

June 15, 2020

Iam Patent 1000 Recommends Robins Kaplan for Patent Litigation for Tenth Consecutive Year

October 16, 2018

Cyrus Morton Achieves Institution of Post-Grant Review, Becomes First Attorney to Litigate All Four PTAB Proceedings

VIEW ALL

Back to Top

Any information that you send us in an e-mail message should not be confidential or otherwise privileged information. Sending us an e-mail message will not make you a client of Robins Kaplan LLP. We do not accept representation until we have had an opportunity to evaluate your matter, including but not limited to an ethical evaluation of whether we are in a conflict position to represent you. Accordingly, the information you provide to us in an e-mail should not be information for which you would have an expectation of confidentiality.

If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.

By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.