Case Number: 1:12-cv-07734-RJS
Following receipt of a joint letter from the parties concerning a discovery dispute, Judge Sullivan
- Ordered, “in light of the obvious acrimony and distrust between the parties and their counsel,” parties to meet and confer regarding discovery issues in a courthouse court room that the Court will reserve for them.
- Denied plaintiff’s request for additional hours and costs for an interrupted 30(b)(6) deposition.
In a related order [Dkt. 92], the court said that the 30(b)(6) deposition should be held where depositions of a corporation are presumptively to be held – at the corporation’s principal place of business – here: Montreal.
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.