Case Number: 1:12-cv-02959-SHS (Dkt. 36)
The court refused to bar defendant from deposing witnesses who had been previously deposed in other OxyContin cases: “The mere fact of a witness’s prior deposition in a separate, albeit formally related, action does not foreclose a further deposition. Defendants may take these depositions, although the court notes that the parties avoid seeking duplicative discovery.”
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.