Motion for reasonable royalty denied due to lack of evidence about royalties

Joao Control & Monitoring Systems, LLC v. Liquid Cash, LLC

Case Number: 1:12-cv-06315-RJS

Judge Sullivan denied without prejudice plaintiff’s motion for damages pursuant to 35 USC § 284. The court noted that the plaintiff had provided neither the amount of defendant’s infringing sales nor the royalty rates obtained from other defendants in other cases. The court set a conference to determine whether the plaintiff will be able to obtain adequate information to renew its motion.  

The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.