Conclusory statements about the relevance of foreign prosecution histories do not support motion to compel

Regeneron Pharms., Inc. v. Ablexis, LLC.

Case Number: 1:14-cv-01651-KBF

Defendant Ablexis requested that the court compel the production of documents associated with the prosecution of non-U.S. patent applications related to the patent-in-suit. The court said that a defendant’s statement that the requested documents are relevant to “noninfringement, invalidity, and unenforceability” was “too net.” She gave Ablexis two days to provide some indication of the “how” or the “why” the documents are relevant.

The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.