According to conventional wisdom, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission prefer structural merger remedies like divestiture over remedies that require ongoing monitoring of post-merger conduct. Structural remedies offer comparative ease of implementation and require less resource allocation for compliance monitoring—and, the argument goes, best allow market forces to take effect in the post-merger world.
Read the full article by clicking the link below.
New Theory, New Practice?
The articles on our Website include some of the publications and papers authored by our attorneys, both before and after they joined our firm. The content of these articles should not be taken as legal advice.