Lead counsel representing an independent three-member Special Committee of the Fiesta Bowl Board of Directors, formed to investigate allegations that the Fiesta Bowl had 1) reimbursed employees for campaign contributions, 2) that a prior investigation had covered up criminal conduct, and 3) that the Fiesta Bowl had made numerous other improper expenditures. Our five-month investigation included 87 interviews of 52 individuals and the review of 55 gigabytes of electronic data and more than 10,000 additional hard copy documents. Our investigation culminated in a 276-page Final Report with 1,562 footnotes and thousands of additional pages of supporting schedules and spreadsheets. The Final Report received widespread praise, including:
- The Arizona Republic's Editorial Board: “the unflaggingly candid 276-page report released by the Fiesta Bowl itself, … exposed all those ugly warts."
- A leading legal commentator stated: "Any lawyer or other person asked to lead a special investigation centered on wrongdoing of the type that now surrounds the Fiesta Bowl should read… [Robin Kaplan’s] report first."
- Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne called the report "comprehensive."
- The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) Task Force -- a Task Force that was created to review the Fiesta Bowl's conduct and our Report -- called our investigation "exceedingly thorough" and noted that had the Special Committee not produced such a "thorough and open report" the Task Force "almost certainly would have recommended termination of the BCS Groups' involvement with the Fiesta Bowl."
- NCAA President Mark Emmert stated that "The [Fiesta Bowl] special report was obviously extremely detailed and outlined behaviors none of us would be supportive of and I think the board was forthright in putting all that information before the various bodies."
- Sports Illustrated's Austin Murphy noted that the Special Committee's investigation (in contrast to an earlier investigation) was "decidedly not a whitewash."
*Past results are reported to provide the reader with an indication of the type of litigation we practice. They do not and should not be construed to create an expectation of result in any other case, as all cases are dependent upon their own unique fact situation and applicable law.